top of page
Search

Embracing the Word Melodrama in My Creative Process

  • Writer: Lisa Hamilton Daly
    Lisa Hamilton Daly
  • Jun 20
  • 3 min read
melodrama

When I named my Netflix development pod "Melodrama and Romance," you should have seen the faces around that conference table. Even other female executives looked uncomfortable. One of them actually asked me, "Why would you want to call something melodrama?"


My answer was simple: because I wanted to reclaim it.


Here's what happened next. I explained that I was tired of apologizing for programming that dared to explore women's feelings. Tired of watching critics dismiss emotional storytelling while praising male-centered shows with equally dramatic elements. Game of Thrones? Just a soap opera with rape and men in the forest. But somehow that gets critical acclaim while stories about female friendship get labeled "guilty pleasures."


The Academic Foundation

My relationship with melodrama started long before Netflix. Back in graduate school, studying 19th and 20th century British literature, I focused on women's fiction that male critics had dismissed for being too emotional. These writers were exploring female subjectivity, examining what it meant to be a woman, how women think and feel.

Critics hated it. Too much emotion, they said. Too focused on feelings instead of "serious" topics. Sound familiar?


That academic background taught me something crucial about the word melodrama. Originally, it simply described dramatic works that emphasized emotional experiences. Nothing inherently wrong with that. The negative connotations came later, particularly when applied to content about women's lives.


Why Words Matter

Claiming the term melodrama became part of my creative process because language shapes how we think about content. When you let other people define your work with their biases, you've already lost half the battle.


Studies show that emotional marketing campaigns can increase brand awareness by 21%, yet the television industry continues treating emotional content as somehow less valuable. Why? Because we've internalized this arbitrary hierarchy that places action above emotion, violence above vulnerability.


My creative process changed when I stopped running from the melodrama label. Instead of trying to disguise emotional content as something else, I leaned into it. Made it a badge of honor. You want to call my programming melodrama? Perfect. Let's make it the best melodrama you've ever seen.


What Melodrama Actually Means

Real melodrama isn't about over-the-top histrionics or manufactured tears. It's about taking emotional experiences seriously. Treating feelings as worthy of sophisticated storytelling. Recognizing that love, loss, friendship, and family dynamics are fundamentally human experiences that deserve quality treatment.


When I developed Virgin River, Sweet Magnolias, and Firefly Lane, I wasn't trying to hide their emotional cores. These shows were unabashedly about feelings. Community. Connection. The messiness of human relationships. Melodrama in the truest sense.

The response proved my instincts right. Emotional content is shared twice as much as non-emotional content because it resonates personally. Viewers weren't just watching these shows; they were living with them. Discussing them. Recommending them to friends who needed comfort viewing.


The Creative Freedom

Embracing melodrama liberated my creative process in unexpected ways. Once you stop apologizing for emotional content, you can focus on making it excellent. No more hiding behind irony or genre qualifiers. Just honest storytelling about what makes us human.


This shift changed how I evaluated projects. Does this story honor its emotional truth? Does it respect the audience's intelligence while acknowledging their feelings? Can we tell this story without condescension or embarrassment?


Those became my filters instead of worrying about whether something felt "prestigious" enough for industry approval.


The Double Standard Exposed


The melodrama conversation reveals entertainment's fundamental hypocrisy. Male-centered programming gets to be emotional without penalty. Think about it: what's more melodramatic than most action movies? All that righteous anger, brotherhood bonds, redemption arcs. But call it "drama" and suddenly it's serious art.


Female-focused emotional storytelling? Immediately categorized as lesser. Soft. Unimportant. AI tools can't create compelling stories because they miss these human truths about bias and cultural conditioning.


Reclaiming melodrama means calling out this double standard. Making space for stories that center female experiences without shame.


The Melodrama Manifesto

My embrace of melodrama influenced more than just my own projects. Other executives started questioning why they felt embarrassed about emotional content. Writers began pitching stories they'd previously thought were "too soft" for serious consideration. Change happens when someone refuses to accept limiting definitions.


When you stop letting other people's biases dictate your creative choices, something shifts in the room. Permission spreads.


Melodrama remains central to my creative process because it reminds me what television can accomplish at its best. We're not just filling time slots or chasing demographics. We're creating emotional experiences that help people feel less alone. That's not guilty pleasure territory. That's essential human connection disguised as entertainment.


Call it melodrama if you want. I'll wear that label proudly while creating content that actually matters to people's lives.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page